🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has stated it is pursuing damages totaling $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This action represents a direct warning by the Kremlin regarding plans to use immobilized Russian state funds to support Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

Based on accounts in Russian state media, the monetary authority filed a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

European Union officials will decide in the coming days regarding a plan to use around €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. The proposal entails providing Ukraine with a large loan to finance its military and economic needs.

The vast majority of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution serves as the primary custodian for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth.

Divergent Legal Views

EU authorities have argued that their proposal is on solid legal ground. Their position rests on the fact that title of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in EU jurisdictions shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has called any use of the assets as theft. Authorities have threatened retaliatory actions, such as confiscating EU private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a key role in diplomatic talks, stated on X that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its assets. He added that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Wider Implications

With statements interpreted as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the assets plan as "a severe assault on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States."

Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. The institution has previously stated it is facing more than 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

While courts in European nations are unlikely to recognize judgments from Russian courts, analysts anticipate Moscow to pursue implementation in countries with stronger ties to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, if relevant assets can be identified," stated a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

EU officials said they are developing measures to deter other countries from assisting any Russian lawsuits against EU entities. Additionally, they are designing protections to protect EU countries with investments in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the complex scheme, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the cash generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched.

Kyiv would solely be required to repay the loan in the event that Russia agreed to pay reparations for the vast destruction inflicted during the nearly four-year conflict.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an different method for financing Ukraine. This involves joint EU debt issuance to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, however, demands full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, described the reparations loan as "the strongest option" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is based on the Russian immobilized funds, which means it doesn't come from our public funds, which is also important," she stated. "Furthermore, it sends a powerful message that if you do all this damage to another country, you must pay for the rebuilding."