🔗 Share this article

The acclaimed actor could be the perfect choice for a daring horror film focused on the biblical figure, but not for the motivations certain fans might assume. Actually, the star does not actually play Jesus in The Carpenter’s Son: his role is credited simply as a craftsman. He is framed as the Joseph within this tale, working to keep his faith as his son (portrayed by Noah Jupe), their now-teenage adopted son, starts to show supernatural abilities. The explanation it's challenging to imagine another major actor in this role is that while the figure is stricken with numerous trials, the actor seems nearly moving certain that this dark, grim little movie is deserving of his effort.

The Actor's Latest Film Selections

Cage has spending that time more selectively recently. He still does more movies than most average viewers could possibly view — as an illustration, are you aware that he has completed several distinct frontier films in the past three years? — yet he also mixes in prestige independent films for example one recent hit, another notable movie, and a further title. This new film sounds like a similar project, in that it’s borderline horror, potentially provocative, and takes a exaggerated premise in a earnest manner.

The Film's Plot and Execution

Unfortunately, filmmaker the director does not reward that serious attention. The film opens in a interestingly wandering place, positioned as drawing from an apocryphal lost gospel about the early years of Jesus. Cage's character, The Mother, and the boy relocate from place to place, afraid of doctrinal intolerance or distrust over The Boy’s mysterious gifts. “Calamity follows us,” The Carpenter mournfully notes. This persists as dark forces attack the family in their latest settlement, getting a jump-start on that familiar Biblical temptation for the son.

At times, the film mirrors an demonic possession-type supernatural thriller, except that no one of the lead characters are clearly inhabited. Rather, they are progressively isolated from one another, while these entities affect a local young woman (Isla Johnston, named “The Stranger”) that The Boy connects to, and gives everyone troubling visions of a grim future. Cage's role in particular struggles with his position in the narrative, sometimes scolding his child he can’t fully understand.

Controversy and Caution

The subject matter is apt to invite debate, and the director treats it with plenty of delicacy — excessive, maybe. The notion of a young man facing his future martyrdom and lured by dark influences is indeed terrifying, but Nathan may be hesitant regarding looking exploitative and eager to indicate his goals, thus he frequently falls back on gloomily threatening filming. Characters constantly ponder — the singer-actress, who displayed real promise in the 2024 Crow remake, interestingly — yields her performance to her religious attire, occasionally interrupted by several disturbing frightening scenes.

Cage's Performance and Film's Flaws

At the same time, the actor dabbles in just the sort of exaggerated performance that those who enjoy his campier roles could be expecting. One scene (shown) in previews in which he erupts and yells “My faith has been shattered!” Should such of dramatic explosion is part of your Jesus-themed horror movie, possibly a more brazenly silly approach would take better advantage of the actor's readiness to exaggerate if needed. Instead, the film is closer to the weaker direct-to-video films Cage made through much of the last decade — not the cheesy thrillers so much as the serious stories and ghost stories that often seem intriguing, and usually have a few choice Cage moments, but ultimately feel like, frankly, inexpensive direct-to-consumer content.

Truthfully, some of those, while less ambitious, were more entertaining overall. This is when I must break my usual practice, not faith-based but work-oriented: Previously, a respected mentor convinced me to banish descriptive terms like “monotonous” or “lifeless” from my reviewing language. These phrases express scant other than a personal and broadly stated restlessness, avoiding the job of vibrantly communicating the intellectual and sensation of seeing an individual production. It’s difficult to convey boredom without sounding boring oneself. It's just as unclear as labeling a movie “notable.” “Explain further,” essentially.

However, I admit, I was bored during much of the film. On the positive side, it is a churchy kind of stultification, not due to The Carpenter’s Son is preachy, but because it requires a type of obedient endurance to sit through it. Eventually early on, the film settles into a cyclic tempo of ongoing suffering, and fails to