🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – not just who would win citywide, and block by block. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of well-known figure recently for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win while failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

It was necessary since they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the tally every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious initially: Mamdani led the early vote by 12 points, but there were large groups of ballots that came in after that and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world in which election day went somewhat badly for him, where Cuomo would have basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But the winner added 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani get additional support from?

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, renters and people struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president last year went for Zohran this year. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the night was the record participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I thought we might go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent opposition group, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to surpass half. He’s at just over 50% but remain around 200,000 votes left to report at that time. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it because afterwards none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He lost any district in any area. Not even Tottenville in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump area. That truly surprised me. The independent kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these Republicans on the island who had a high participation. I think there was significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the Greek landlords and residents supported the independent. Thus there was some opposition. But overall, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the election we reported on if the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

Exist areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were strongly supportive. So I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city means politically? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – candidates will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that each urban center in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – since youth reside there, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.